Lifting Plan (Rigging Study)
The engineered document that turns a crane lift from an ambition into a controlled operation — loads, radii, ground pressures, rigging, exclusion zones, and the named people accountable for each.
Definition
A lifting plan, sometimes called a rigging study for heavy or engineered lifts, is the written and drawn document that specifies exactly how a load will be lifted, moved and placed. It is produced by a competent Appointed Person, checked, briefed and signed off before the crane hook attaches to anything. It covers load weight and centre of gravity, crane selection and configuration, rigging arrangement, ground bearing pressures, exclusion zones, wind limits, communication protocol and the sequence of operations.
Why It Matters
Crane collapses and dropped loads are among the most public and deadly failures on any site. LOLER in the UK, ASME B30 in the US, AS 2550 in Australasia and equivalent regimes worldwide all require that every lift beyond routine use be planned. Even for routine lifts, a generic plan is expected. Without a written plan, the operation depends on the memory and judgement of the crew — and memory and judgement, unassisted, is what inquiries find at the root of every dropped load.
What a Lifting Plan Contains
- Load description — weight, dimensions, centre of gravity, lifting points.
- Crane details — make, model, configuration, boom length, counterweight.
- Load chart extract for the specific radius and configuration.
- Utilisation percentage — never over 85% of chart capacity for non-routine lifts.
- Ground bearing pressures under each outrigger, with mat sizing.
- Rigging arrangement — sling type, angle, WLL, spreader beams, shackles.
- Exclusion zone drawing, with public and site interfaces marked.
- Wind limit and shut-down criteria.
- Communication method — hand signals, radio channel, backup.
- Named Appointed Person, Lift Supervisor, Slinger, Signaller, Crane Operator.
- Emergency arrangements — dropped load, power failure, crane failure.
Real-World Example
On a petrochemical turnaround in the Netherlands, a 210-tonne reactor was to be replaced through the roof of an existing structure. The Appointed Person produced a rigging study running to 84 pages, including finite element analysis of the tandem-lift attachment points, ground-bearing calculations for the LTM 11200 crawler, a minute-by-minute lift script, and three separate exclusion-zone plans for different phases. The lift took nine hours; incident count was zero. In the debrief, the site manager commented that the plan had contained one small error — a slightly optimistic wind limit at the final set-down — which the AP had caught during pre-lift verification and corrected on the day. That correction, made possible only because there was a document to check, saved the operation. A verbal plan has nothing to catch.
How to Run It Properly
- Every non-routine lift gets a bespoke plan. A generic template is not a plan.
- The Appointed Person is competent, named and independent — not the crane operator, not the salesperson.
- Ground conditions must be verified, not assumed. A slab plan is not a ground survey.
- Utilisation stays below the chart limit by a real margin — 75% is comfortable, 85% is the ceiling for planned lifts, 100% is a headline.
- Rigging is inspected by the slinger before every use, and any defect withdraws the item immediately.
- Toolbox brief the plan with everyone involved. Confirm understanding, not attendance.
- Weather monitoring is live, not the morning forecast. Shut down at the stated limit, not "when it feels dangerous."
Practical Lessons Learned
- The load never weighs what the drawing says. Confirm with a weigh cell or supplier certificate, then add a margin.
- Wind kills more lifts than overload. A load in the air is a sail — plan for the gust, not the average.
- The most dangerous lift on any project is the one that "we've done a hundred times."
- The banksman position matters. Line of sight to both operator and load, or the lift stops.
- Rehearse the emergency, once. Everyone knowing the drop protocol before the crane starts is worth the hour.
Expert Tips
- Photograph the outrigger mats in position before the lift and after. Ground failure is the second-most-common contributor to crane accidents.
- Colour-code the exclusion zone on the ground with tape — visual is stronger than verbal.
- Radio discipline: one channel, one voice. The signaller talks, no one else transmits during the lift.
- Video the lift. The recording is training material and, if needed, evidence.
- Debrief every non-routine lift within 24 hours. Lessons captured immediately are lessons kept.
Common Mistakes
- Generic plan re-used across lifts of different weight or geometry.
- Load weight taken from a drawing without verification.
- Ground bearing pressures ignored on suspended slab or made ground.
- Rigging inspected only on delivery, not before each use.
- Wind limit set but no live monitoring.
- Exclusion zone breached by "just one person" during the lift.
Key Takeaways
- Every non-routine lift is engineered, checked, briefed and signed before the hook attaches.
- The Appointed Person is competent, named, and empowered to stop the lift.
- Load, crane, ground, rigging, wind and exclusion — all six are planned, all six can stop the lift.
- The margin between chart capacity and planned load is a safety feature, not inefficiency.
- Discipline in the plan is what makes the lift routine, not repetition.
Related Concepts
Interlocks with Method Statements, Temporary Works Design Register, Toolbox Talks and Site Mobilisation Plan. Lifting plan templates at PMMilestone.org.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do routine lifts need a written plan?
Yes — usually a generic plan approved by the Appointed Person, briefed to the crew and reviewed periodically. Non-routine lifts always require a bespoke plan.Who is the Appointed Person?
A competent individual, formally appointed in writing, responsible for planning the lift, selecting equipment and personnel, and issuing the plan. They are not the crane operator.What utilisation is acceptable?
Industry practice is to plan below 85% of chart capacity for engineered lifts. Higher utilisation should trigger additional engineering review and, ideally, a bigger crane.Is a load chart from the crane manual enough for ground?
No. Ground bearing pressures depend on outrigger geometry, mat size and soil condition. A geotechnical check is required for any significant lift on unverified ground.What wind limit should we use?
Manufacturer's limit for the crane and configuration, with a margin for load geometry — a large flat load is affected by wind long before a compact one. Live monitoring is required.What if the load weight is uncertain?
Verify with a weigh cell or supplier certificate before the lift, add engineering margin, and re-plan if the actual weight exceeds the assumed weight. Do not proceed on estimates for critical lifts.What is a common misconception about Lifting Plan (Rigging Study)?
That the topic is well-defined across all references. In practice, definitions vary between PMBOK, PRINCE2, AACE and ISO 21500 — this entry uses the definition most aligned with field practice on capital projects, and flags where the standards diverge.Which related encyclopedia entries should I read alongside Lifting Plan (Rigging Study)?
Read Earned Value Management, Critical Path Method and the DCMA 14-point assessment next. The full A–Z is available in the PMMilestone Encyclopedia, and quick one-line definitions live in the PM Glossary on the flagship platform.How does Dr. Hassan Eliwa's research treat Lifting Plan (Rigging Study)?
Dr. Hassan Eliwa's research focuses on owner-side project controls, schedule integrity and forensic delay analysis on capital construction and power programmes. Lifting Plan (Rigging Study) is treated through that lens — what a planning or controls engineer is expected to do with it on a live project, not its textbook definition alone. See the full research library at PMMilestone Research Articles.How is Lifting Plan (Rigging Study) defined on PMMilestone Research & Insights?
The engineered document that turns a crane lift from an ambition into a controlled operation — loads, radii, ground pressures, rigging, exclusion zones, and the named people accountable for each. For the full treatment, see the definition, principles, applications and related entries above — every encyclopedia entry follows the same research-grade structure.
People also ask
Follow-up questions practitioners search for next — each one points to the calculator, template or reference entry that answers it.
Where is this in the glossary?
Quick-lookup definitions across 1,200+ PM terms. PM Glossary on PMMilestone.org ↗
Which learning track covers this end-to-end?
Structured tracks from beginner planner to programme controls director. Project Controls Academy ↗
Which book goes deeper than this entry?
Practitioner field handbooks with worked numerical examples. Books & Publications ↗
Which calculator on PMMilestone.org applies here?
The integrated EVM workbook covers most cost-schedule diagnostics. EVM Calculator ↗
Related Entries
More in Construction Execution
- Letter AAs-Built Drawings Management
The disciplined capture, red-lining and issue of drawings that reflect the works as they were actually constructed, not as they were originally designed.
- Letter CConcrete Pour Card
A single-page control document that authorises a specific concrete pour by confirming design, formwork, reinforcement, embedments, weather and inspection sign-offs are all in place before the truck arrives.
- Letter DDaily Site Diary
The contemporaneous daily record of everything that happened on a construction site — labour, plant, weather, deliveries, visitors, instructions, delays — kept in chronological order and signed each day.
- Letter MMethod Statement
A written document that explains, step by step, how a specific construction activity will be executed safely, in what sequence, with what resources, and under what controls.
- Letter PPiling Records
The rig-by-rig, pile-by-pile log of driven or bored piles — depths, sets, torques, concrete volumes and rejections — that forms the primary evidence of a foundation's integrity.
- Letter PPre-Construction Site Survey
The physical walk, measure and record of a site before any mobilisation — the survey that decides whether the tender assumptions were fiction or a plan.
Further reading on PMMilestone.org
Curated companion resources hosted on the flagship platform, PMMilestone.org.
- For practitioners who want to go deeper, the Project Controls Academy.
- Engineers researching this topic typically continue with the Schedule Health Checker.
- A practical companion to this entry is the Failure Database.
- Closely related on the flagship platform is the Learning Tracks.
- Useful alongside this article is the Books & Publications.
- Many readers follow this up with the Risk Register Template.
- Project teams often pair this with the PMMilestone.org knowledge hub.